Bug #74
SDMX-HD Rules - Annotation element AnnotationType should be mandatory
| Status: | New | Start date: | 06/29/2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | % Done: | 0% |
||
| Category: | Community Feedback | |||
| Target version: | v1.0 | |||
| Origin: | Forum | Origin Reference: | http://www.sdmx-hd.org/boards/2/topics/show/14 |
Description
8.6.1 .. * - Suggested Additional Rule : Annotation element must always be accompanies by an AnnotationType value
History
Updated by Bob Jolliffe over 2 years ago
Gary Patchen wrote:
8.6.1 .. * - Suggested Additional Rule : Annotation element must always be accompanies by an AnnotationType value
I don't think we need to overspecify at this point as we don't have any concrete use cases yet. Just allow what SDMX allows. In the future, where we find ourselves using specific Annotations in a way which benefits from being standardized we might want to introduce some SDMX-HD specific constraints.
Suggest reject